Run provenance  ·  2026-04-12 13:15:12 EDT  ·  nutrient-growth@43a3ab7 [uncommitted changes]  ·  eranagmon@LT-0919936  ·  Darwin 24.2.0 arm64 (16 cores)  ·  Python 3.12.9

E. coli Whole-Cell Simulation Comparison

Three-way comparison of vEcoli 1.0 (vivarium engine), vEcoli 2.0 (composite migration), and v2ecoli (pure process-bigraph). All use the same ParCa parameters, initial state, and biological process logic.

Performance

vEcoli 1.0 (vivarium)
11.5x
219s wall for 2520s sim
vEcoli 2.0 (composite)
11.0x
228s wall for 2520s sim
v2ecoli (pure PBG)
11.7x
216s wall for 2520s sim
MetricvEcoli 1.0vEcoli 2.0v2ecoli
EnginevEcoli 1.0 (vivarium)vEcoli (vivarium/composite)v2ecoli (process-bigraph)
Load time1.95s2.32s3.19s
Sim duration2520s (42.0 min)2520s (42.0 min)2520s (42.0 min)
Wall time218.9s228.1s215.6s
Speed11.5x11.0x11.7x
Final dry mass707.2 fg707.2 fg696.6 fg
Chromosomes222
Forks444

Growth Comparison

Dry Mass
Cell Mass
Growth Rate
Volume

Chromosome Replication

Chromosomes
Replication Forks

Mass Components (side-by-side)

Mass Components
RNA Breakdown
Structural Components

Dry Mass Comparison Table (fg)

TimevEcoli 1.0vEcoli 2.0v2ecoli
0 min383.7380.9380.9
1 min383.7383.7383.9
5 min406.4406.4407.7
10 min436.9436.9437.7
20 min507.9507.9506.7
30 min589.1589.1586.7
40 min686.0686.0677.3